Recently, the outposts about the next Chief Executive have become enthusiasm. Several suspected candidates often express their opinions on different social issues, but I feel that they lack a complete set of theories and central ideas, so they will only go back to the former Chief Executive. The old road of “I will do a good job” when the election is up.
The professionalism of the responsible wage earners is certainly commendable. However, in the current complicated political, economic and democratic demands, the next Chief Executive can no longer be a headache, a painful foot, or even a slap in the face. We need a powerful leader who has a comprehensive layout and actual combat, just like Moses leading the people out of the Red Sea. When Jiang Zemin was appointed as the president of the country, there were “three represents” as the guiding ideology of governance; Hu Jintao had a “scientific view of development.”
I believe that to thoroughly resolve the deep-seated contradictions in Hong Kong society: the disparity between the rich and the poor and the high cost of living in grassroots must establish the governance philosophy of “capitalism in the grassroots and people-oriented spirit.”
Grassroots People-Oriented Spirit
What is the “grassroots people-oriented spirit”? Society is made up of people with different economic incomes. There are rich, middle-class, low-income, and non-income people. The latter two are the “grassroots” people I am referring to. Capitalism has developed for so many years, and the word “freedom” has been used. The intangible monopoly has aggravated the gap between the rich and the poor. The employment of large consortia seems to be equivalent to benefiting social harmony.
I clarify here that I have no hatred and rich attitude, and many real estate developers are my friends. Merchants only make adjustments in accordance with government policies. Therefore, when formulating policies, the government must take care of the grassroots people as a big premise, and understand that poverty alleviation is not like providing employment. The high cost of living has turned labor into life, and the poor have been unable to accumulate funds and become small and medium-sized enterprises. This society has slowly lost its vitality, social mobility has disappeared, and the middle class has shrunk.
I am an industry in the IT industry, and I have some ideas for IT poverty alleviation. My direction is also very basic: medical food and shelter. In this regard, Octopus can fully play the role of social enterprises. If the Octopus is implanted into the chip, the name of the holder, the ID number and the code of the area of residence will be memorized, and the individual reported assets will be attached. The comprehensive score will be divided into abcde level 5, cage home residents are grade a, and luxury home residents are grade e. . Then my thoughts can be easily realized. I named this new Octopus “Social Enterprise Octopus”.
推出「社企八達通」
醫：不要誤會我寫錯字。「衣」在香港算是便宜，不講究的話一件T恤可以穿很多年。但醫療費用對窮人是很大的負擔（特別是家有長期病患者）。
要扶貧，「醫」是首要任務。香港的醫療水平及醫護人員的質素其實相當高，所以才形成醫院兵荒馬亂，急症室其門如市。有些手術甚至富豪指定不去養和去瑪麗。醫療改革的成功在於將公立醫院和私營醫療服務分流。假如病人拿「社企八達通」卡在公立醫院掛號，卡內晶片立即顯示病人的級別；收費變與級別掛鈎。
在使用同樣的公營醫療服務時，住貝沙灣的病人當然要比住在華富邨的病人付出更昂貴的費用。這樣逐漸把有充裕經濟能力的病人分流到私營醫療。
食：我都經常光顧快餐店。但今年大家樂、美心、大快活不只加價，分量也縮少了。a級顧客有七折優惠，e級要加三成收費。
最近公職會舉辦了一個家用品及食物展銷會，平均價格比惠康、百佳便宜三成。這表示草根人民在日常生活的開支很高。現行的銷售模式，中間商以上架費控制銷售渠道，決定交易條件，抽走大部份利潤。假如在社區敎育市民在網上用團購方式，領匯及房委會轄下的公共屋邨提供便宜的場地給社區合作社，作為物流集散配送，這樣的方式fine tune後應該可行。
住：買房問題，IT當然幫不上忙。但九龍塘的居民與九龍城的居民和付煤氣及電費的價格上是否應該一樣呢？在能修訂價格系統前，能否在每年的盈利中發出百分之三十給草根的ab階層呢？於每年春節前通過「社企八達通卡」增值發放。企業承擔社會責任已是大勢所趨，特別是一些有壟斷性的公用事業。
行：馬路是有限的資源，電子道路收費系統應該實施。當使用「社企八達通卡」乘坐港鐵或巴士時，草根人民ab類應有折扣優惠，de級別的應加百分之五十至一百。富人坐港鐵目的是省時間，並非省錢。
西隊、東隊、大老山隧道在專營權續約招標時，可以考慮以收費價低者得。
我上述的提議涉及的都是一些已上市的公用事業，或許有人會以上市公司股東利益有損為理由，而否定其可行性。在外國，煤電鐵路都是政府長期補貼的。港英殖民地政府採取買辦式的管治，在「借來的地方」分判公用事業出去。
時移勢易，市民和富豪商人都意識到企業的社會責任。每年城中富豪都熱心公益，捐款數以億計；市民對慈善機構的捐款也非常熱心。假如我們能將公用事業定性為社會企業，股東選擇低迴報代替捐款，行善而能回本帶利，不亦樂乎？
我長期在國內工作，對香港的情況不熟悉，希望粗淺的文章，能起「抛磚引玉」的作用。
中央政策組前任非全職顧問、iProA互聯網專業協會中國事務委員會主席
